dy/dx

Forum rules
Entries must be in English and should be related to Firemath or to this Website.
We reserve the right re remove entries.

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: dy/dx

dy/dx

Post by mathnewbie » Thu Feb 21, 2013 18:40 UTC

For the Leibnitz notation for the derivatice should one use:
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mo>&DifferentialD;</mo>
<mi>y</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>&DifferentialD;</mo>
<mi>x</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>

-OR-

<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>dy</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>dx</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>

Basically, is &DifferentialD simply the lower case version of Euler's differential operator (and therefore should only be used in those contexts)?

As far as appearance is concerned, this appears to capture textbook appearance most closely:
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi mathvariant="italic">dy</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi mathvariant="italic">dx</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>

Are there any plans for Firemath to have a palette of composite elements like dy/dx?

Top

cron